State v. Robinson

CourtListener 10155938Scctapp07.10.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.,

Helen Robinson, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 Thomas Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-449

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
October 7, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Helen Robinson appeals the revocation of her probation.  Robinson
argues the circuit court erred in revoking her probation solely for failure to
report.  After a thorough review of the
record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] Robinson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.