State v. Dingle

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Rahmelle Jamaal
Dingle, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-458

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
8, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Rahmelle Jamaal Dingle appeals the revocation of his
probation.  Dingle argues the evidence presented at the probation revocation
hearing was insufficient for the circuit court to revoke his probation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Dingle's
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ, concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.