CourtListener 10155917•State v. Lyles
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Willie Lyles, Appellant.
Appeal From Kershaw County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-474
Submitted October 1, 2009 Filed October
13, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Willie Lyles appeals his probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation without holding a full evidentiary
hearing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HUFF,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.