State v. Sanders

CourtListener 10155914Scctapp13.10.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Calvin Bernard Sanders, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-469

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
13, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant

Legal Counsel John B. Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Calvin Bernard Sanders appeals his
probation revocation, arguing the trial court erred in revoking his probation without
first affording him an opportunity for allocution.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1] 

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.