CourtListener 10155903•State v. Thomasson
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
John Wesley Thomasson, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-484
Submitted October 1, 2009 Filed October
15, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: John
Wesley Thomasson appeals, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking a year of
his community supervision because there was insufficient evidence to support a
revocation. After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
Hearn, C.J., Konduros, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.