CourtListener 10155893•State v. Steven Andrews Ryon
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Steven Andrews
Ryon, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-493
Submitted October 1,2009 Filed October
21, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Steven Ryon appeals
his probation revocation, arguing the
trial court erred in revoking his probation without holding a full evidentiary hearing. After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.