State v. Stanfield

CourtListener 10155889Scctapp26.10.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leonard G. Stanfield, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County

Ralph F. Cothran, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-498

Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October
26, 2009 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliot, all of Columbia; and Solicitor I. McDuffie Stone, III, of Beaufort, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Leonard
G. Stanfield appeals his convictions and sentences for kidnapping, first-degree
burglary, and armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred by failing to charge
the jury on the defense of alibi.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.