Servicemaster v. Harriett

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

PF&H Inc.,
d/b/a Servicemaster of Charleston, Respondent,

v.

Jill E.
Harriett, n/k/a Jill E. Bell, Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, Loretta
R. Harriett, and Enterprise Bank of South Carolina, Defendants,

of whom Roger
L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, and Loretta R. Harriett are the Appellants.

Appeal From Colleton County

Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-430

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
September 8, 2009

AFFIRMED

Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, and Loretta R. Harriett, all
of Lodge, for Appellants. 

Zachary J. Closser, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Roger L. Harriett, Billy Lee Harriett, and Loretta R. Harriett (the Harrietts)
appeal the circuit court's judgment against them.   On appeal, the Harrietts
argue the circuit court erred in finding the service contract and mechanic's
lien are enforceable against them.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authority:  In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of McCracken,
346 S.C. 87, 92, 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) (holding an issue is deemed
abandoned on appeal if the argument in the brief is not supported by authority
or is only conclusory). 

AFFIRMED.

HEARN,
C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.