CourtListener 10155789•State v. Moton
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT
SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Toreeze Marquel
Moton, Appellant.
Appeal From Edgefield County
James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-289
Submitted May 1, 2009 Filed June 4, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Toreeze
Marquel Moton appeals his guilty plea and sentence for assault and battery with
intent to kill, arguing the trial judge erred in imposing a harsh sentence
based on his refusal to cooperate with law enforcement. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.