CourtListener 10155741•Mack v. Bull
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Traci Mack, Appellant,
v.
Trudy Bull, Respondent.
Appeal From Darlington County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-358
Submitted June 1, 2009 Filed June 23,
2009
AFFIRMED
F. Barron Grier, III, of West Columbia, for Appellant.
Henry Thad White, Jr., of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Following
an automobile accident, Trudy Bull filed suit in magistrate's court for
property damages. After Traci Mack could not be located, she was served by publication.
Thereafter, Mack was adjudged in default and after a hearing, Bull was awarded
property damages. This appeal is from the denial of Mack's Rule 60(b), SCRCP,
motion to set aside the judgment. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 60(b),
SCRCP ("On motion and upon such
terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative
from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1)
mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect . . . fraud, misrepresentation, or
other misconduct of an adverse party."); BB & T v. Taylor, 369
S.C. 548, 551, 633 S.E.2d 501, 502-03 (2006) (explaining the decision to grant
or deny a motion for relief from judgment lies within the sound discretion of
the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of
discretion).
AFFIRMED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.