State v. McFetridge

CourtListener 10155716Scctapp29.06.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael James
McFetridge, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2009-UP-371

Submitted June 1, 2009 – Filed June 29,
2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott; all of Columbia,  and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Michael James McFetridge appeals his guilty plea to
impersonating a police officer.  McFetridge argues the court erred in accepting
his guilty plea because there was no factual basis.  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ. concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.