CourtListener 10155673•State v. Harkless
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Donte James Harkless, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-217
Submitted April 1, 2009 Filed May 20, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney Generarl John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Donte
James Harkless appeals his guilty plea for two counts of armed robbery, two
counts of kidnapping, assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature,
second-degree burglary, strong arm robbery, and grand larceny. He argues his
guilty plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough
review of the record and counsels brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
Hearn, C.J., Pieper and Lockemy, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.