CourtListener 10155665•In The Interest of Rashad I.
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In The Interest
of Rashad I., A Minor Under The Age Of Seventeen, Appellant.
Appeal From Laurens County
Joseph W. McGowan, III, Family Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-230
Submitted May 1, 2009 Filed May 27, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of
Columbia, and Solicitor Jerry W. Peace, of Greenwood; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Rashad I.
appeals his guilty plea and sentence to assault and battery of a high and
aggravated nature and attempted armed robbery, arguing the family court erred
refusing to consider sentencing him to probation and alternative placement. After a thorough review of the record
and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.