G&S Supply Co., Inc. v. Watson

CourtListener 10155654Scctapp28.05.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

G&S Supply
Co., Inc. d/b/a Vinyl Wholesale, Respondent,

v.

Brian Alan
Watson d/b/a Two Brothers, Appellant.

Appeal from Florence County

Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-244

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed May 28, 2009

AFFIRMED

Louis David Nettles, of Florence, for Appellant.

Steven L. Smith, of North Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Brian Alan Watson, d/b/a Two Brothers (Watson), appeals the trial court’s order
awarding judgment to G&S Supply Company, Inc., d/b/a Vinyl Wholesale
(G&S).  He argues the
trial court's judgment to G&S in the amount of $6,127.51 was not supported
by evidence in the record.  We disagree. 
At trial, G&S presented both testimony and invoices supporting the trial
court's award.  See Stanley v. Atlantic Title Ins. Co., 377 S.C.
405, 409, 661 S.E.2d 62, 64 (2008) (holding in an action at law, tried without a jury, the trial court's
findings of fact will not be disturbed unless found to be without evidence which reasonably supports the court's findings).      

AFFIRMED.

Short, Williams,
and Lockemy, JJ., concur

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.