State v. Williams, J.

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.,

Jesse Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-242

Submitted May 1, 2009 – Filed May 28, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jesse
Williams appeals his guilty plea and sentence for driving under the influence,
third offense, arguing the plea court erred (1) in accepting his plea because
the State failed to establish his prior convictions;  and (2) by failing to
advise him of the mandatory minimum and maximum sentence he faced.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.