State v. Montgomery

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Reginald
Montgomery, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

 J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-134

Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 9,
2009 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Reginald
Montgomery appeals his conviction and twenty-two year sentence for armed
robbery.  Montgomery argues the trial court erred by admitting photographic
lineup evidence.  Additionally, Montgomery asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After a thorough review of the record and
both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.