State v. Cohens

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ronald Cohens, Appellant.

Appeal From Georgetown County

 J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-064

Submitted February 2, 2009 – Filed
February 9, 2009  

AFFIRMED

Tara Dawn Shurling, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Senior
Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., all of Columbia; Solicitor John
Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ronald Cohens appeals his conviction for assault
and battery with the intent to kill and failure to stop for a blue light. 
Cohens alleges the trial court erred in proceeding with trial without his
counsel and refusing to remove a juror.  We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  State v. Johnson, 363 S.C. 53, 58-59, 609 S.E.2d 520, 523 (2005) (holding
if a party fails to object properly at trial, the party is procedurally barred
from raising the issue on appeal); State v. Bell, 374 S.C. 136, 147, 646
S.E.2d 888, 894 (Ct. App. 2007) (explaining a decision on whether to replace a
juror with an alternate is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will
not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion).

AFFIRMED.[1]

SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.