CourtListener 10155545•State v. Wlison
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
John E. Wilson,
Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From Darlington County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-071
Submitted February 2, 2009 Filed
February 10, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: John
E. Wilson, Jr. appeals his convictions for armed robbery and possession of a
weapon during the commission of a violent crime, and consecutive sentences of
thirty and five years' imprisonment, respectively. Wilson's counsel argues the
State's closing argument denied Wilson the right to a fair trial. Wilson
asserts the trial court erred in admitting the photo line-up into evidence,
failing to evaluate Wilson to determine if he was competent to stand trial, and
failing to ask Wilson if he needed counsel to be appointed before selecting a
jury. After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT,
THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.