CourtListener 10155533•Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes
Waterford Place Homeowners Association v. Barnes
CourtListener 10155533Scctapp12.02.2009
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Waterford Place Homeowners Association of Lexington,
Inc., Respondent,
v.
Richie D.
Barnes, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
James O. Spence, Master-in-Equity
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-088
Submitted February 2, 2009 Filed
February 12, 2009
AFFIRMED
Richie D. Barnes, of Irmo, for Appellant.
Walter B. Todd, Jr. and J. Derrick Jackson, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Richie D. Barnes appeals the master-in-equity's award of attorney's fees and
damages, arguing the master abused his discretion in hearing the matter and
erred in awarding attorney's fees and damages. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR ("The
Court of Appeals need not address a point with is manifestly without merit."); State v. Tyndall, 336 S.C. 8, 16, 518 S.E.2d 278, 282 (Ct. App. 1999) ("Conclusory
arguments constitute an abandonment of the issue on appeal."); Solomon
v. City Realty Co., 262 S.C. 198, 201, 203 S.E.2d 435, 436 (1974) (holding
an issue is abandoned on appeal if argued in an incorrect single conclusory
statement that leaves the error assigned unargued).
AFFIRMED.[1]
SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.