CourtListener 10155508•Glover v. State
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In the Court of Appeals
Steven R.
Glover, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from McCormick County
William P. Keesley, Plea Judge
Diane S. Goodstein, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-014
Submitted January 2, 2009 Filed January 8, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy
Chief Attorney Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney
General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Dean
Grigg, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the
denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR).
Because there is
sufficient evidence to support the PCR judges finding that Petitioner is
entitled to a belated appeal, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari
and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v.
State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).
After consideration
of counsels brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), Petitioners direct appeal is dismissed,[1] and counsels motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.