State v. Wingate

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In
The Court of Appeals        

The State, Respondent,

v.

Lavada E. Wingate, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-703

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 15, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans,
Jr., and J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Lavada Wingate appeals from the revocation of her probation, arguing the trial
court erred in revoking her probation without holding a full evidentiary
hearing.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.