State v. Kuzma 1

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jerry Kuzma #1, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-708

Submitted December 1, 2008 – Filed
December 16, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of
Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jerry Kuzma appeals his probation revocation.  Kuzma
argues the trial court erred in revoking his probation based on his guilty plea
pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.