State v. Artis

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,  Respondent,

v.

Elrich Artis,  Appellant.

Appeal From Chester County

James E. Lockemy, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-616

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 10, 2008 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield,
Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Elrich Artis appeals his conviction of second-degree
burglary and sentence of seven years.  Artis argues the trial court erred by
not giving a more thorough reasonable doubt charge. After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Artis’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.