State v. Bradley

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Stanley Bradley, Appellant.

Appeal From Calhoun County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-613

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of
Columbia, and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Stanley Bradley was found guilty of first degree
burglary and criminal sexual conduct in the first degree and sentenced to
concurrent sentences of thirty-five and thirty years, respectively.  Bradley
appeals his convictions, arguing the trial court erred by admitting testimony
referencing Bradley’s drug use.  Bradley filed a pro se brief contending his
second trial violated his constitutional rights by exposing him to double
jeopardy.  After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Bradley’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, HUFF, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.