State v. Williams

CourtListener 10155370Scctapp10.11.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Corey A. Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-617

Submitted November 3,2008 – Filed November
10, 2008 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail,
of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Corey A. Williams was found guilty of armed robbery,
kidnapping, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent
crime.  Williams was sentenced to thirty, thirty, and five years, concurrent
terms of imprisonment.  Williams argues the trial court erred by improperly
considering Williams’ decision to go to trial during sentencing.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Williams’
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.