State v. Richards

CourtListener 10155358Scctapp12.11.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David B.
Richards, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-620

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 12, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  David B. Richards appeals his convictions for four
counts of criminal sexual conduct with a minor and one count of lewd act on a
minor.  Richards was sentenced to concurrent terms of twenty years for each
criminal sexual conduct with a minor charge, and a consecutive fifteen year
sentence for the lewd act on a minor charge.  Richards argues the trial court
erred by denying his request to charge the jury on the lesser included offense
of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.  Richards filed a
separate pro se brief.  After a thorough
review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Richards’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

ANDERSON, THOMAS, JJ., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.