CourtListener 10155352•State v. Hughey
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Tarren Hughey, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-635
Submitted November 3, 2008 Filed
November 13, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tarren Hughey appeals his conviction of grand larceny
and sentence of five years imprisonment. Hughey argues the trial court erred
by failing to sever his trial from his co-defendants. After
a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Hugheys appeal and grant counsels
motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.