State v. Wilson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joseph Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal From Williamsburg County

 Paula H. Thomas, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-641

Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed
November 17, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Patrick James McLaughlin, of Florence, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Joseph Wilson appeals his convictions for murder, criminal conspiracy,
attempted armed robbery and possession of a weapon during a violent crime.  Wilson argues the trial court erred in: failing to charge the jury on accessory to murder;
failing to charge the jury on manslaughter; allowing the state to proceed with
both the charge of armed robbery and possession of a weapon during a violent
crime; and granting the state’s motion to amend the date on the indictments.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Wilson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.  

WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.