CourtListener 10155335•State v. Brown
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Troy A. Brown, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-555
Submitted October 1, 2008 Filed October
9, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne
Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Troy A. Brown appeals his
conviction of burglary, assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature,
and kidnapping, and sentence of eighteen, ten, and eighteen years,
respectively. Brown argues the trial court erred by failing to grant his
motion for a directed verdict. After a thorough review of the record, and
counsels brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss Browns appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.