State v. Shepherd

CourtListener 10155308Scctapp14.10.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Robert Shepherd, Appellant.

Appeal from Lexington County

 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-573

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
14, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission
of Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott; Office
of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of
Lexington; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Shepherd was convicted of trafficking
cocaine, ten grams or more, but less than twenty-eight grams.  On appeal, Shepherd’s counsel argues the trial court erred in denying Shepherd’s
motion to suppress the cocaine discovered in the search of the car.  Shepherd also filed a pro se brief.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Shepherd’s pro se brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and GEATHERS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.