CourtListener 10155302•State v. James
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
David Shawn
James, Appellant
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-582
Submitted October 1, 2008 Filed October
15, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: David Shawn James was on probation for breaking into a
motor vehicle. While on probation, James was arrested, and his probation was
revoked. James argues the trial court arbitrarily and capriciously revoked his
probation. After a thorough
review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss James appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.