CourtListener 10155296•State v. Spencer
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Earl Spencer, Appellant.
Appeal From Cherokee County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-589
Submitted October 1, 2008 Filed October
15, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: A
jury found Earl Spencer guilty of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual
conduct. Spencer argues the trial judge
erred in refusing to grant his motion for directed verdict. He also filed a
pro se brief. After a
thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Spencers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.