Stauch v. Pearce

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Eugene A.
Stauch, III, Appellant,

v.

Deborah A.
Pearce, Respondent.

Appeal From Charleston County

 Robert S. Armstrong, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-595

Submitted October 1, 2008 – Filed October
17, 2008

AFFIRMED

Eugene A. Stauch, III, of North Charleston, Pro Se, for
Appellant.

Don C. Gibson, of North Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Eugene A. Stauch appeals the family
court’s award of attorney’s fees to Deborah A. Pearce.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Doe v. Doe,
370 S.C. 206, 212, 634 S.E.2d 51, 55 (Ct. App. 2006) (“[W]hen an appellant
neither raises an issue at trial nor through a Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion, the
issue is not preserved for appellate review.”); Historic Charleston
Holdings, LLC v. Mallon, 365 S.C. 524, 539, 617 S.E.2d 388, 396 (Ct.
App. 2005) (stating when a trial court makes a general ruling on an issue, but
does not address the specific argument raised by the appellant and the
appellant does not make a motion to alter or amend pursuant to Rule 59(e),
SCRCP, the appellate court cannot consider the argument on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

ANDERSON, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.