CourtListener 10155250•State v. Collier
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Laquan D.
Collier, Appellant.
Appeal from York County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-531
Submitted September 2, 2008 Filed
September 11, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Collier was convicted of murder, attempted armed robbery, criminal conspiracy,
and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime. On appeal, Collier argues the judge erred by admitting evidence of a
robbery that took place the day after the charged incident. Collier filed a pro se brief, which raised the same argument. After a thorough review of
the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.