CourtListener 10155237•State v. King
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Eugene King, Appellant.
Appeal From Orangeburg County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-538
Submitted September 2, 2008 Filed
September 17, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville; for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Eugene
King appeals his conviction and sentence for murder, arguing the trial court
erred by admitting his confession in violation of Jackson v. Denno, 378
U.S. 368 (1964). King also asserts numerous pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record, counsels
brief, and Kings pro se brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Kings appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT,
THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.