CourtListener 10155138•State v. Howard
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
James Howard, Appellant.
Appeal From Beaufort
Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-348
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 9, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Issac McDuffie Stone, III, of Beaufort,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: James
Howard appeals from his guilty plea for two counts of assault on a
correctional officer, one count of throwing bodily fluids, and one count of
simple assault and battery. On appeal, Howard argues his guilty plea failed to
comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969). After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J, concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.