State v. Kirkpatrick

CourtListener 10155136Scctapp09.07.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Travis A. Kirkpatrick, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-346

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 9, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Travis
A. Kirkpatrick appeals his guilty pleas for possession of marijuana,
trafficking in crack cocaine, and possession of crack cocaine with intent to
distribute within proximity of a public park, for which he received sentences
of one year, eight years, and ten years, respectively.  He argues his guilty
plea failed to comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama,
395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the
record, counsel’s brief, and Kirkpatrick’s pro se brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.