State v. Korens

CourtListener 10155112Scctapp11.07.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Cedric O’Neal
Korens, Appellant.

Appeal From Laurens County

 Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-370

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 11,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy
Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans,
Jr., Legal Counsel, and J. Benjamin Aplin, Legal Counsel, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Cedric Korens appeals the revocation of his probation.  Korens
argues the circuit court was unfair in its probation revocation because the
circuit court was informed Korens’ medical condition caused his drug use.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Korens’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.