State v. Hill

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marvin Hill, Appellant.

Appeal From Fairfield County

 Kenneth G. Goode, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-379

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 14,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Joseph L. Savitz, III, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Marvin Hill appeals his guilty pleas for second- degree burglary, two counts of grand
larceny, and distribution of crack cocaine.  On appeal, Hill alleges the plea
court, by advising him of his right to appeal, rendered his plea conditional
and therefore invalid. After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.