State v. Williams

CourtListener 10155103Scctapp14.07.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Donald Evan
Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

John L. Breeden, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-383

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 14,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,  and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Donald Evan Williams pled guilty to petit larceny and
burglary and received sentences of time served and five years, respectively. 
He appeals his guilty plea, arguing there was not sufficient factual basis for
the trial court to accept the plea.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Williams’
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.