State v. Young

CourtListener 10155102Scctapp14.07.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Raymond Lewis
Young, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-382

Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 14,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott; all
of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert Mills Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Young
pled guilty to three counts of second degree lynching, one count of armed
robbery, and one count of breaking and entering an automobile.  On appeal,
Young alleges the plea did not meet the
mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Young’s appeal
and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.