CourtListener 10155073•State v. Pritchard
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
David R.
Pritchard, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-414
Submitted July 1, 2008 Filed July 21,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Pritchard
appeals his guilty plea to two counts of first degree burglary, two counts of
grand larceny (greater than $5000), one count of grand larceny, enhanced
pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §16-1-57 (1987), and one count of possession of a
stolen vehicle. On appeal, Pritchard alleges the plea did not meet the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395
U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review
of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Pritchards appeal and grant counsels motion to be
relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.