SC DSS v. Timothy E.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals\

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Timothy E.,
Katina E., Hope M. and Brenda L., Defendants,

Of Whom Timothy
E. and Katina E. are the Appellants.

In the interests
of:  A.P., DOB: 06/08/1990; T.E., DOB: 11/16/1992 A.E., DOB: 1/13/1995; all
minors under the age of 18.

Appeal from Aiken County

 Kellum W. Allen, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-288

Submitted June 1, 2008 – Filed June 4,
2008

AFFIRMED

Jeffrey Raymond Moorehead and Timothy E., both of Aiken, for Appellant
Timothy E.

Charles Collins Mayers, of Augusta and Katina E., of Aiken, for
Appellant Katina E.

Dennis M. Gmerek, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Timothy
E. and Katina E. appeal a family court order
issued subsequent to an intervention hearing.  After a thorough review of the record
pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987) and S.C.
Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Frederick Downer, Sr., S.C.Sup.Ct. Order dated
February 2, 2005 (expanding the procedure set forth in Cauthen to
situations where an indigent person appeals from an order imposing other
measures short of termination of parental rights), we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HEARN,
C.J., KONDUROS, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.