State v. Aragon

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher
Scott Aragon, Appellant.

Appeal From Fairfield County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-307

Submitted June 1, 2008 – Filed June 12,
2008

DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John R. Justice,
Sixth of Chester, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Christopher Aragon appeals his sentence for distribution
of methamphetamine and trafficking between 10 and 28 grams of methamphetamine. 
On appeal, Aragon argues his sentence is unconstitutionally disproportionate
and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Aragon’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.