State v. Beaney

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Steven Beaney, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-237

Submitted April 1, 2008 – Filed April 16,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Steven Beaney appeals his guilty plea to assault and
battery of a high and aggravated nature.  On appeal, Beaney argues the trial
judge erred by not addressing his request to plead guilty under North
Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970).  Specifically, Beaney
asserts the trial judge failed to expressly and specifically accept Beaney’s
plea as an Alford plea.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] Beaney’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
SHORT, and THOMAS JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.