CourtListener 10154871•State v. Shannon
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Daniel Shannon, Appellant.
Appeal From Lexington County
William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-115
Submitted February 1, 2008 Filed
February 13, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Daniel
Shannon appeals his guilty pleas to
murder, armed robbery, and second-degree arson. On appeal, Shannon maintains
his guilty pleas failed to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin v.
Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969), because the plea court failed to advise him
of his right to remain silent. After a
thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Shannons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.