CourtListener 10154827•State v. Weathersbee
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kurtino Damon Weathersbee, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-017
Submitted January 1, 2008 Filed January 10, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant
Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliot, of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Kurtino Damon Weathersbee appeals his convictions for
armed robbery, first-degree burglary, and kidnapping, as well as his sentence
of three concurrent terms of eighteen years imprisonment. Weathersbee contends
the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his drug use. After a thorough
review of the record, counsels brief, and Weathersbees pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Weathersbees appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF
AND PIEPER, JJ., AND CURETON, A.J., CONCUR.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.