State v. Weathersbee

CourtListener 10154827Scctapp10.01.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kurtino Damon Weathersbee, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-017

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant
Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliot, of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Kurtino Damon Weathersbee appeals his convictions for
armed robbery, first-degree burglary, and kidnapping, as well as his sentence
of three concurrent terms of eighteen years imprisonment.  Weathersbee contends
the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his drug use.   After a thorough
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Weathersbee’s pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Weathersbee’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF
AND PIEPER, JJ., AND CURETON, A.J., CONCUR.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.