State v. Woods

CourtListener 10154826Scctapp10.01.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Marcus Antonio Woods, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

John L. Breeden, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-016

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, of Columbia; Solicitor Warren B. Geise, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Marcus Antonio Woods appeals his guilty pleas and
sentence of fourteen years imprisonment for second-degree criminal sexual
conduct with a minor and resisting arrest, arguing the plea court failed to
comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238
(1969), in accepting his plea. After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief,
and Woods’ pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] Woods’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF AND PIEPER, JJ., AND GOOLSBY, A.J., CONCUR.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.