State v. Dezern

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timothy Wayne Dezern Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-037

Submitted January 2, 2008 – Filed January 11, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant
Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliot, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold
W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Timothy Wayne Dezern appeals his conviction for
first-degree burglary and sentence of fifteen years imprisonment, arguing the
trial court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict for him.  He contends
the State presented insufficient evidence of his guilt.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief,
and Dezern’s pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Dezern’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF AND PIEPER, JJ., AND CURETON, A.J., CONCUR.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.