State v. Lewis

CourtListener 10154802Scctapp14.01.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Lewis, Appellant.

Appeal From Dorchester County

James C. Williams, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-053

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January 14, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant
Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliot, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Dorchester, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Kenneth Lewis appeals his conviction for assault and
battery with intent to kill and sentence of twenty years imprisonment, arguing
the trial court erred by admitting his second videotaped and written statement
to police.  After a thorough review of
the record, counsel’s brief, and Lewis’s pro se brief, pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss Lewis’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.